beurocracy = bureaucracy. moreso = more so. steep = step (spellcheck wouldn't have caught this one, although a grammar checker would've). unproportional = disproportional. forth = fourth (Forth is a programming language, so a spell checker doesn't catch this, nor would a grammar checker.)
'For safekeeping, he had decided to keep the box in the refrigerator, just to be on the safe side.' I'm prone to using phrasiology like this also. I'm always told that it's redundant, and bad.
Page seven, last paragraph (the partial one), there's a spurious leading double quote.
Page eight, first full paragraph, question mark at the end. Third paragraph, last sentence, second to last word... Twelfth paragraph, spurious double quote at the end. pout = pouting.
Page nine, incomrehendible = incomprehensible.
On a legal note, (IANAL) I believe his offense is actually improperly conducting a phase one trial without IRB approval. Of course, most people in his position would've also not realized that - his bio, as far as it is discussed, didn't previously include any testing on human subjects, and his intent here is actually to steal, even though other people wouldn't have been able to determine that without hearing it from him. She's a fully-informed, consenting adult, the sample was used for testing purposes, so the problem he'd actually face is that as soon as anyone found out, he would lose all of his funding, and possibly be kicked out of the university, as they attempted to salvage their funding.
On a scientific level - drugs have an effect on a cellular level. For a given subject with a fixed receptivity level, the number of cells a dose of a drug will affect is relatively constant. This is why many drugs have a dosage based on body weight. (Pain relievers, for the most part, only affect neurons, and most adults have approximately the same number of those, so dosages tend to be very stable. Many other drugs are also specifically targetted - birth control pills only target the ovaries, for example. But in this case, since the target mass is doubling...) The dosage would need to double - and a dosage intended to make a cow's mammaries double would have a much more significant effect on a human woman. Also, the formula has a scaling issue - in order to not cause pain, it would need to also trigger skin growth - and as the breasts get much larger, the rate of skin growth needed actually reduces. (The volume goes up linearly with the mass - but the surface only goes up at x^(2/3). Or, putting it another way, the volume and mass increase at the cube of the radius, the surface only at the square of the radius.)
